<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The friction coefficient</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cindyalvarez.com/roi/the-friction-coefficient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/roi/the-friction-coefficient</link>
	<description>Better products and product management through constant iteration and stronger communication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/roi/the-friction-coefficient/comment-page-1/#comment-48352</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cindyalvarez.com/the_experience/?p=9#comment-48352</guid>
		<description>Interesting insight. What I have found is that the time to payoff matters more than the size of the payoff: in other words prospects use the estimated time to get a benefit as a rough proxy for the amount of risk (and therefore level of &quot;discount&quot;) in a potential benefit. 

Pip Coburn has a slightly different formulation in his &quot;Change Function&quot; model.

Why do people adopt new technologies? People change habits when the pain of their current situation exceeds their perceived pain of adopting a possible solution. I call that the &quot;change function.&quot; It may seem simplistic. It&#039;s supposed to be.

Change = f (level of current crisis, perceived pain of adoption)

see http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/105/next-essay.html and his book http://www.amazon.com/Change-Function-Technologies-Others-Crash/dp/1591841321</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insight. What I have found is that the time to payoff matters more than the size of the payoff: in other words prospects use the estimated time to get a benefit as a rough proxy for the amount of risk (and therefore level of &#8220;discount&#8221;) in a potential benefit. </p>
<p>Pip Coburn has a slightly different formulation in his &#8220;Change Function&#8221; model.</p>
<p>Why do people adopt new technologies? People change habits when the pain of their current situation exceeds their perceived pain of adopting a possible solution. I call that the &#8220;change function.&#8221; It may seem simplistic. It&#8217;s supposed to be.</p>
<p>Change = f (level of current crisis, perceived pain of adoption)</p>
<p>see <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/105/next-essay.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/105/next-essay.html</a> and his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Change-Function-Technologies-Others-Crash/dp/1591841321" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Change-Function-Technologies-Others-Crash/dp/1591841321</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

