<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe We Should Call It Minimum Viable Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cindyalvarez.com/execution/maybe-we-should-call-it-minimum-viable-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/execution/maybe-we-should-call-it-minimum-viable-process</link>
	<description>Better products and product management through constant iteration and stronger communication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Malaysia News</title>
		<link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/execution/maybe-we-should-call-it-minimum-viable-process/comment-page-1/#comment-49405</link>
		<dc:creator>Malaysia News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cindyalvarez.com/?p=590#comment-49405</guid>
		<description>These four steps are really Minimum Viable Process.
I think step 2 &amp; 3 both are very mostly effect.......what do you think about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These four steps are really Minimum Viable Process.<br />
I think step 2 &amp; 3 both are very mostly effect&#8230;&#8230;.what do you think about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/execution/maybe-we-should-call-it-minimum-viable-process/comment-page-1/#comment-49237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cindyalvarez.com/?p=590#comment-49237</guid>
		<description>awesome post, cindy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome post, cindy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/execution/maybe-we-should-call-it-minimum-viable-process/comment-page-1/#comment-49233</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cindyalvarez.com/?p=590#comment-49233</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I think step 2 is where most get hung up.... maybe because of the potential consequences of step 3.  A lot of times the min viable feature set is a lot less than people think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I think step 2 is where most get hung up&#8230;. maybe because of the potential consequences of step 3.  A lot of times the min viable feature set is a lot less than people think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
