“Good Enough” vs. “Good Enough Never Is”
Currently loving “good enough” via @cindyalvarez and “good enough never is” (@matthewemay re: Elegance)… Now, erm, how to reconcile them?
I started my career as a designer, so I find a particular irony in now being a vocal proponent of scrappy, get-it-done, ‘quick and dirty’ approaches.
But here’s how I reconcile it: “good enough” is not an acceptable end. It’s a means to an end. “Good enough” enables the pursuit of excellence.
I don’t know which workflow or messaging or feature is going to strike that perfect satisfaction within the user. And neither do you. (And don’t give me that ‘genius design’ argument – you are not Steve Jobs, and neither is anyone else except Steve Jobs.)
They are not the same things.
If I spent more time tweaking and revising, I would be happier. But odds are, my customers wouldn’t.
So we start with “good enough”, and we watch and we learn. And that’s how we know where to focus our tweaks or our ‘aw hell, scrap this whole thing and do it over’ attention. And we do it again, and again, and again. Good enough never is.. for long.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Popularity: 1% [?]-
http://topsy.com/trackback?utm_source=pingback&utm_campaign=L2&url=http://www.cindyalvarez.com/design/good-enough-vs-good-enough-never-is Tweets that mention » “Good Enough” vs. “Good Enough Never Is” The Experience is the Product | Better product management and products — Topsy.com
-
http://twitter.com/thorbs thorbjørn andersen
-
http://illiotross.wordpress.com Elliot Ross
-
http://twitter.com/cindyalvarez cindyalvarez
-
http://twitter.com/cavemandrawings cavemandrawings
-
http://twitter.com/KentBeck KentBeck
-
http://twitter.com/rundmcollie rundmcollie
-
http://twitter.com/mikisetlur mikisetlur
-
http://twitter.com/johndmitchell johndmitchell
-
http://twitter.com/ferreira_hugo ferreira_hugo
-
http://twitter.com/_imagiNATION_ _imagiNATION_
-
http://twitter.com/lsc_news lsc_news
-
http://twitter.com/Jamzz Jamzz
-
http://twitter.com/thorbs thorbs

