Better Product Managers, and Product Management

Archive for the ‘Communication’ Category

Customer Development Interviews How-to: What You Should Be Learning

I wrote earlier about finding people for your customer development interviews.

Once you’ve found people for your interviews, you’re probably thinking, “Great, I can ask them if they’d use my product!”

Wrong.

OK, you’re thinking, “then what should I ask them?”

A better way to think about it is, what should I be learning from this interview?

It’s really important to understand the philosophy behind the customer development interview, particularly because it runs so counter to entrepreneurial instincts.  Be direct. Act. Get stuff done.  You ask questions, you get “70% good” information, you decide.  But when it comes to identifying a problem and potential solutions, the direct approach doesn’t really work.

Why? Because people are too polite to say ‘no’.  Because people can’t imagine technologies that don’t exist yet.  Because people overestimate how much effort they’re willing to put into something.  Because people think incremental, not disruptive.  Plenty of reasons.  Let’s accept this and move on.

So, what should I be learning from the customer development interview?

  • How is your customer currently dealing with this task/problem?  (What solution/process are they using?)
  • What do they like about their current solution/process?
  • Is there some other solution/process you’ve tried in the past that was better or worse?
  • What do they wish they could do that currently isn’t possible or practical?
  • If they could do [answer to the above question], how would that make their lives better?
  • Who is involved with this solution/process?  How long does it take?
  • What is their state of mind when doing this task?  How busy/hurried/stressed/bored/frustrated? [note: learn this by watching their facial expressions and listening to their voice]
  • What are they doing immediately before and after their current solution/process?
  • How much time or money would they be willing to invest in a solution that made their lives easier?

The important thing about these questions is that they set up an environment where the customer is the “expert”.  They avoid yes/no answers, and give people the opportunity to tell a story – one that may trigger them to think of related problems they’re having, or may trigger more questions from you to ask later.

These questions are applicable for both consumer and enterprise products.  (I’ve used this question list on B2B internal tools, B2B2C consumer-facing apps, and B2C widgets.)

Can you give me an example?

These questions make a lot more sense when applied to a concrete example, so I’ll make one up: an online grocery shopping application. Your hypothesis is that busy households need a better way of making sure they don’t run out of things and don’t have to make a zillion trips to the market.  You’ve found customers to talk to – now you need to understand how they feel/behave when it comes to grocery shopping.

“Tell me about how your household handles grocery shopping…”

Whether they describe a detailed or haphazard process, this is your competition.  This is what you have to be substantially better than, in order to get customers to change their behavior.

“How is that process working for you?”

If you’re lucky, a customer may launch immediately into a rant on how they’re always running out of Cheerios or spending too much because they have to buy milk at the overpriced corner store.  If not, you may gently prompt them with triggers like “Do you generally have the ingredients you need to make dinner?” or “How much time do you spend shopping?”

Validation check: they might not care enough to change their current habits, even if they’re not 10o% optimal.

“Have you tried other approaches, like online grocery delivery or keeping a list on your iPhone?”

Customers who have tried other approaches = a good sign that this is enough of a problem that they’re motivated to fix it.

Validation check: Even if your customer thinks they spend too much time grocery shopping, if they’ve never tried any approach to fix this, then they don’t care enough to try your product. (On the other hand, if they have tried other things, you should try to learn why these other approaches didn’t help or were unsustainable.)

“If you could improve anything about your grocery shopping routine, what would it be?”

If customers don’t immediately have an idea, you could gently prompt with “spend less time, less money, have fresher/healthier foods on hand…?”

This question is going to prompt people to jump to solutions (like “I want a cost comparison tool”), rather than articulating their problems, so you need to immediately follow up with:

“If you had a cost comparison tool, how would that make your life easier?”

(basically, the 5-Whys approach)  You want to discover what’s at the root of this suggestion – is it more important that they pay the lowest prices, or do they want to cut down on trips to several different grocery stores, etc.

Validation check: if they really can’t articulate why this solution would make their lives better, it probably won’t.

“What people in your household buy groceries?”

These are the potential stakeholders of your solution.  This can also open up insights – if your customer says “I do all the shopping, but I wish my teenage kids could pitch in too”, that’s an area ripe for product exploration: how can we help division of labor? how can we shift simple tasks from the time-constrained/expensive resource to a “cheaper” one?

“What do you do immediately before you go grocery shopping?”

This is a great way to find ways to differentiate your product – to most people, grocery shopping starts when you walk through those electronic sliding doors.  But to your customer, it might start with asking your wife and kids what they need, making a list, looking up recipes online, or getting the baby changed and buckled into her carseat.

(Your product probably won’t solve for the baby thing, but it gives you insight into your customers’ state of mind – how busy they are, how stressed, do they only have one free hand to use…?)

“What do you do immediately after you go grocery shopping?”

Again, to your customer, grocery shopping isn’t over until the frozen foods are in the freezer and the cans in the cupboard.  This may reveal new product stakeholders: the 8- and 10-year old who never go to the grocery store, but who unload the car and put things away.

“Would you be willing to spend some money to get a cost comparison tool or other tools that would make your grocery shopping easier?”

If the customer says yes, suggest an amount (“say, $10 a month?”)

Validation check: If the customer says ‘no’, or says ‘yes’ in a hesitant way, they’re not going to use your product.

And finally…

After all these questions, feel free to ask about your specific solution and how interesting the customer finds it.  Give them the opportunity to ask questions of you.  You never know where inspiration will strike!

The Efficiency of Inefficiency

About a month ago I was getting ready to send out an email blast asking for feedback when I took a moment to stop and think.

I asked myself, If I got this in my inbox, how likely would I be to reply to it? and immediately answered, Not very.

The problem with online tools is that they make it incredibly easy to solve problems, but in doing so, they sometimes lead you to solve the wrong problem efficiently.

With customer communication, the problem is not “contact customers and get it over with”.

Contacting your customer – whether it’s via email, phone, or carrier pigeon – is a means to an end: listening to what they have to say.

(more…)

Proximity Makes You Lazy

Clearly, we weren’t in agreement. But was it because we actually disagreed, or because we weren’t aligned on exactly what the situation was?

This scenario happens a lot with offshoring and virtual offices, and it’s why many companies have thrown up their hands and brought teams back in-house.

There, when confusion arises, you can immediately have a face-to-face conversation, maybe in front of a whiteboard. Discuss until you both get it. Simple, right?

Yesterday, I was having one of those “we are just not in sync” situations.  Except the coworker in question was 2,000 miles away. No face-to-face option, no whiteboard option.  Instead, we both had to battle through a long IM conversation, punctuated by “I sent you a quick sketch – is this closer to what you mean” interjections.

It was painful.  (Well, not so much for me – but almost certainly for him.)  But it forced us to be incredibly precise, and to keep confirming what the other was saying. “So you mean we’d default to this option and then continue to that screen?”  “No, let me rephrase…”

By the end of the conversation we were finally aligned.  But I couldn’t help but think that we would’ve given up sooner if we were both in the same location.  Why? Because proximity makes you lazy.

When you start getting frustrated, it’s easy to find an excuse to get out of there so you can go roll your eyes in private.  After all,  you both know that your colleague is just across the room.

But you may not be at your desk next time a question arises. Or, your coworker may feel self-conscious – jeez, she spent a half-hour explaining this to me, I feel stupid not “getting it”.  Maybe I should just figure it out on my own.

In the book Made to Stick, there’s an experiment described where one person tapped out a song in their head and the other had to guess what song it was.

The tappers got their message across 1 time in 40, but they thought they were getting their message across 1 time in 2… When they’re tapping, they can’t imagine what it’s like for the listeners to hear isolated taps rather than a song. This is the Curse of Knowledge. Once we know something, we find it hard to imagine what it was like not to know it.

I’d guess it has to do with proximity, too.  ‘He’s right there’, you think, ‘how on earth can he not get it?’

I’m certainly guilty of this.  If you look at my sent-mail folder, you’ll see some embarrassingly bad emails I’ve sent to local coworkers.  Things like “did you finish that doc for that meeting today?” Which doc? Which meeting? Could I be any more context-free?

We expect someone farther away to have more difficulty understanding what we mean.  So we make the kind of affordances that we ought to be doing all the time, for all people.

Next time you’re sending an email, explaining a concept, or scheduling a meeting, try pretending that your audience is a thousand miles away:

  • Summarize what you’re trying to achieve
  • State your assumptions (and ask that they be challenged if they’re wrong)
  • Make a hypothesis (“I think this means X – is that correct?” is much more helpful than “I don’t understand this”)
  • Restate the other person’s words (“So you’re saying Y and Z – is that correct?”)
  • Finish with a clearly-stated bullet point summary of what you’ve agreed upon/decided

The extra five to ten minutes you invest in clarity will save you hours later on.